Unusual Interpretation of the Principle of Res Judicata
Susan Fritts2023-01-13T13:36:10+00:00Richard Pratt v. S.D. Warren- The Workers' Compensation Board Appellate Division recently issued a decision that offers an unusual interpretation [...]
Richard Pratt v. S.D. Warren- The Workers' Compensation Board Appellate Division recently issued a decision that offers an unusual interpretation [...]
Kevin Eaton v. City of Bangor - Where the employee had limited work capacity but surveillance showed some ability to [...]
James Salvatore v. O’Reilly Auto Enterprises- Where one of two sec. 207 medical examiner’s opined that Salvatore’s 2016 left shoulder [...]
Leroy Cass v. New Balance Shoe- Where Cass had a known pre-existing left shoulder condition and the employer’s medical dept. [...]
Joseph Masselli v. Yellow Transportation, Inc.- Because the ALJ failed to make sufficient findings and conclusion regarding the 312 IME’s [...]
Kathleen Tabb v. Corning, Inc.- Order Dismissing Appeal- The Appellate Division dismissed the employer’s appeal because it was not filed [...]
Abel Lang v. Energy North, Inc.- Because the ALJ simply repeated testimony and arguments made without stating which testimony was [...]
Norton v. Aon Service Corp. – In Norton v. Aon Service Corp., Dec. No. 22-32, Ms. Norton suffered a work [...]
Bickford v. Central Maine Healthcare Corp. - While at work on November 25, 2019 Ms. Bickford was punched in the [...]
Gary Wallace v. New Balance Athletics, Inc. – The Appellate Division affirmed the ALJ’s determination that injuries sustained while walking [...]